Skip to main content

Typo, myopia, or poor execution?


This posting is the first part of two stories about what I think are examples of poor marketing execution. Today, companies spend millions of dollars in new ways not only to creatively engage consumers, but also in establishing a long term relationship with them. Despite all their efforts, some still fall short in ensuring their marketing efforts are executed to perfection. If these efforts happen to fail in the long run, the entire marketing department is there to be blamed. Sometimes simple mistakes in executing the final stages of a program can cost the entire failure of the marketing program. Often times, the planning, research, and strategy stages of a marketing plan are the first ones to be scrutinized for not "getting in right" from the beginning, but executing correctly a plan is as important, if not more than the stages of its conception because that is what consumers ultimately will experience at the point of sell or service.

Two weeks ago, I went to the Nissan dealership to take my car to its regular oil change service. Usually, I bring a book with me, grab a cup of coffee, and sit down and wait about 30 to 45 minutes for the service to be completed. Every time I go there, I also like take a look at the new cars they have at showroom. This time I remember looking at a beautiful red 300 Z, when suddenly a salesman vigorously approached me and start explaining all the car features. He gave me his card and I thanked him. I also told him that I was just looking around. As I was heading back to the waiting room, I looked at his business card and read "Se Habela Espanol." I didn't know if I should laugh or go tell him that his card had a big typo. Instead, I stopped and said to myself. "We are in 2008, I think by know most of the salesmen people, especially in Texas should know Spanish and also should know that it is Habla and not Habela." I also thought that it could've been a simple typo; nonethelsess, I noticed that the name of the salesman was Caesar and not Cesar, as I remember it is normally spelled. I don't know what it was, but if a company like Nissan spends big dollars on Spanish advertising, or hires sales people that are supposedly bilingual, so that they can better communicate with the Latino community. Why not double check that all your efforts are being executed correctly? I don't want to be paranoid or anything, but I think that sometimes these little mistakes in execution can turn off people who really appreciates their heritage and language, and thus return as customers.

Comments

  1. WOW, what a story!!!
    It really makes you wonder how many people or potential customers have noticed that little ‘typo,’ and how many have been turned off. The most interesting thing that came to mind while reading your posting was not even in relation to Nissan, but was in relation to the ‘Caesar’ or ‘Cesar’ brand.
    Whenever you are in the market for a new or used car for that matter, you want to have the most knowledgeable sales person… why? Because you want to be able to get the best car possible. Anyway knowing that Caesar claims to know Spanish, but doesn’t know how to write it makes me doubt his sale expertise. Fine, if he wants to be known as Caesar that is ok, that is a different struggle that he chooses to have (the Latino vs non-Latino name), but I definitely don’t want him selling me a car in my language when he clearly doesn’t even know how to speak it….
    While doing research for a bank in Dallas I remember a comments that speaks to a very true Hispanic insight.
    “I speak enough English to get around… but when speaking business, I speak Spanish.”
    Going back to your main point about poor execution…
    If only Nissan knew… but that is the problem with franchisees. A good example happened to the Jack in the Box in Juarez, Mexico, and a McDonald’s in Russia. Corporate asked them to follow instructions. With Russia I believe it was in relation to the flags, and in Juarez it was about using branded napkins… both didn’t follow the rules, and both were closed. I’m not suggesting that Nissan does this, but I am suggesting that there needs to be someone caring about the brand at this level…
    It’s not about micromanaging, it’s about brand managing.

    ReplyDelete

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Necessary Brand Extension?

As the yogurt wars continue to strengthen, brands are needing to find a stronger point of differentiation and go after stronger niches. While reading something online a couple of days ago, the above ad came up and left me thinking; is this right? Let me begin by saying that I love yogurt and in fact have it for breakfast most often than not. To be quite frank, I have never being a big fan of Yoplait - it's too sweet for my taste. This could very well be the fact that I grew up in Mexico, where yogurt is sour, so in my mind, the more sour it is the more natural. So you might be wondering what brand of yogurt I buy - well it is actually Greek, Fage, and I have to say that I love it. With that said, and given my inquisitive nature, I began asking people if they would buy the Yoplait Greek. Interestingly enough, of those who are currently buying some sort of Greek yogurt, not necessarily Fage said that they wouldn't buy it. Those who consumer Yoplait said that they would definitely...

KFC's Interesting Ad Buy... Is this right?

A huge part of advertising strategy is placement - because depending on where you buy is he awareness that you will get. But before I go into my observation as to the picture you see on the blog, let me begin by sayint that not too long I was reading a very interesting article on the "Disneyzation of Society," which can be boiled down to 4 key objectives: 1) Theming, 2) De-differentiation of Consumption, 3) Merchandising, and 4) Emotional Labor. Though my attempt on today's post is not to talk about the paper it is important to say why it is that I am bringing up. About a decade ago or so, a book that tackled the idea of globalization through the usage of a major corporation, McDonald's, revolutionized the way we look at business - the author called this McDonalization. McDonalization is the idea that global corporations seek to maximize 1) efficiency, 2) calculability, 3) predicatability, and 4) control. Well, in order to be able to accomplish the 4 things, companies...

Is this not a bit too intrusive?!

I know that good marketing is supposed to catch you a bit off guard and make you think about the message but this is just too much... Why? Because, 1) although it in fact was unexpected, it crossed the privacy line (which by today's standards is pretty low). 2) it's not creative, and 3) lacks authenticity... Which is the last thing you want if you deal with money. Thought?!