Skip to main content

Private Labels are Winning the Battle

Below is an excerpt from a really good Ad Age article. After that, I've drafted a couple of interesting key-take-aways....

Let me know your thoughts...
_________________________________
Private Label Winning Battle of Brands
Marketers Face Moment of Truth As Retailers' Lines Soar to Historic Sales High
By Jack Neff


The unthinkable
At the same time, volume is shrinking in staple categories where that once seemed impossible, with unit sales of shampoo, for example, down 7.7% last year in all channels, including Walmart.
"Portion control is in," said Thom Blischok, president-consulting and innovation at IRI.


"There is no previous period that exactly parallels where we are today," said Mr. Blischok, who believes consumer spending could remain weak for four to eight years and lead to a "downturn generation" that learns to scrimp and save permanently, including buying more private label.
But the threat to brands goes beyond that.


"Retailers have been talking about destocking, taking out the No. 3 or No. 4 brands, for more than a decade," said Clorox Co. Chairman-CEO Don Knauss at CAGNY. "We're finally starting to see that happen." Walmart, particularly, is aggressively looking to winnow brand assortments and category footprints in some cases, he said.

Executives of Kraft, Kellogg, General Mills, Con Agra and Sara Lee all said that advertising will be a key component of keeping their brands top of mind, and Mr. Lafley noted that P&G brands have pumped out a combined 100 separate "value messages" in advertising to argue for their superiority over private label in recent months. But the response to the downturn also has become increasingly promotional. In one case in December, a mommy blogger bragged of how she combined P&G coupons, rebates and drug-store promotions to buy two bottles of Olay Regenerist facial cleanser for free and get $8.66 in cash back. "We're starting to train consumers that the deal price is the only price," Mr. Blischok said. "We're pumping out the morphine of deal, deal, deal. And we need to be talking value."
_____________________________________________

Anyway, here are some key take aways to consider when drafting new brand strategies during this recession.

  1. There is no safe brand or category during this economic downturn. Used to be that only over-the-counter meds were the ones affected, but now its also feminine products and skincare.
  2. The competition has broaden. Our brands, are not only competing against PL but also against Value brands. (Difference between the two is quantity).
  3. Portion control. It used to be that I use as much as I want, now its, I use what I need. Even shampoo sales are declining... no, its not that people are showering less, its that people are being cautious of how much they use.
  4. Brands need to advertise more during this time. Now is the times to create/differentiate your brand from that of PL.
  5. It costs much more to gain a new consumer than to keep existing ones. HH over $100K are also buying PLs
  6. Increasing promotions definitely help, but in the short term... they move sales, but doesn't create value for the brand. We need to be very careful about this... careful about brand dilution.
  7. WM / HEB manage their brands like General Mills and Nestle etc.... which we know, but know that we are competing against other marketers, not only retailers and space.
  8. If the economy keeps going like its going thus far, brands need to become leaner in production (more than they already are, can you imagine this?) which will eliminate the number 3 and 4 brands in the marketplace.

Which brings me to my next question.... If PL brands are increasing in strength, maximizing resources, competing in prices and value... were do we stand? My answer is... In the mind of the consumer... which can bring us problems in the future, for our consumers are getting much smarter. If nothing or few things differentiate us from PL, we are in big trouble, for we have created 'brand inflation.'

Lowering prices is great, but we need to be careful that we don't dilute the brand... we need to position it as, during hard times, we take a bullet for you consumer, because we know you want to cook (drive, drink, wear) the brand you identify with.

Last but not least, I will close with the line they used... "we are pumping out the morphine of deal, deal, deal. And we need to be talking value."

Thoughts?!

Comments

  1. Sorry yito but things are not good even premium brands like ours
    Are competing in price with 3 month rollbacks,etc one needs to be
    Careful with were to put the money. For every penny we spend,we must
    Expect a good Roi. Yes we need to be in the minds of consumers, but
    What matters know is to do so at the moment of truth which is the shopping
    Aisle. Also I think our consumer will appreciate us to be more price conscious
    During this rough times. I hear you but right now you need to be tactical as part of your core strategy

    ReplyDelete

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Its the explanation of the phenomena that gives the insight...

I have always found the following idea among the most interesting in business: numbers = true insight. Strong statement right?! Depending on where you stand, Positivist or Post, you might say that the above statement is true. Now, dont get me wrong, I enjoy numbers (a lot actually), but I feel that businesses nowadays are hanging thei hat on a percentage. Some examples of things I've heard - "Our brand tracking is showing that our awareness has declines 2%... are our TV not working?"  "The advertising strategy is not really moving product (sales)... I really haven't seen a percentage increase..." And I could honestly keep giving examples, but the above two are some I can recall pretty fast. Now, let me say that there is nothing wrong with the above statements, what bothers me is that with numbers we tend to look for one answer and one answer only. The thinking behind this is that there has to be some variable that is affecting the phenomena.But, if the...

Is this not a bit too intrusive?!

I know that good marketing is supposed to catch you a bit off guard and make you think about the message but this is just too much... Why? Because, 1) although it in fact was unexpected, it crossed the privacy line (which by today's standards is pretty low). 2) it's not creative, and 3) lacks authenticity... Which is the last thing you want if you deal with money. Thought?!

Honestly... Who is thinking Arby's??

Having worked at a McDonald's and for the McDonald's brand for a couple of years, seeing advertising like the one below reminds why the golden arches still have the higher share in the fast food market. Please know that I am not saying that McD's has this share solely because of its advertising, but at the very least, their advertising doesn't turn anyone away. While watching TV a couple of weeks ago, I came across the Arby's B-day spot, which you can see below. After watching it I just thought... wow, somebody actually produced this spot? Let me say that there is really nothing wrong with the production, it is more the idea that got produced. The strategy behind this campaign was pretty insightful and good. I'm Thinking Arby's . Ownable , different and niche enough that when you want to eat something hot and tasty only Arby's will suffice, hence you crave and can only think Arby's ... the problem was the execution. Does the guy like the food?...