Skip to main content

What many are talking about...



Last weekend I went to visit my friend Pepe in Houston, TX. While we were watching the football game between the Cardinals vs. Falcons, we saw Pepsi's new TV spot, which showcases the brand's newest logo. Pepe automatically said, "It looks like Obama's logo, they copied it." I thought to myself, "Really? How so? Why would they do that?" Apparently I haven't paid enough attention to Obama's logo to suggest that it looks like Pepsi's new logo, which cost around $1 million to craft, or vice versa. Today, I started looking around on the internet, and I found out that hundreds of people are commenting about this topic on blogs, forums and news articles. My point is not to argue whether they look the same (it is clear to me that they don't), or if PEPSI copied Obama's logo, which I heard a rumor that they both used the same creative team, or if PEPSI is using Obama's wave to regain the new generation momentum once again. There is plenty of conversation about this topic on the web.
The point I want to make is that that both Obama and PEPSI have successfully accomplished their goal. They have created two iconic symbols that are recognized by most and represent value to people. Perhaps PEPSI's intention was to be associated with Obama, or perhaps it is a mere coincidence. Whatever it is, it has people talking about PEPSI, and that can only mean on thing... mission accomplished!

Blogged with the

Comments

  1. I like your comment about "Pepsi wanting to regain the new generation momentum" by basking in Obama's glory, if you will.

    I have to say that to me they do look alike. Let us also remember that Pepsi's logo was created way before Obama's.

    Last, but not least, it makes sense that consumer find both logos to be very similar, for they will hardly ever have to see them next to each other.

    What is more interesting to me is to research on the palette of colors chosen, and why the wavy lines. On Obama's you can clearly see the 'horizon of change' with soft colors.

    ReplyDelete
  2. I'm going to agree with Isaac. Pepsi's logo has been around for quite some time and has always been round and always red, white and blue.

    I do think it is humorous, however, that people are reacting to a "change" in Pepsi's logo, when change is the basis for Obama's logo.

    In my opinion, it's just coincidence as I am sure that Pepsi has been reworking their logo for a while. But it is always good to have people talking about your brand!

    ReplyDelete

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Its the explanation of the phenomena that gives the insight...

I have always found the following idea among the most interesting in business: numbers = true insight. Strong statement right?! Depending on where you stand, Positivist or Post, you might say that the above statement is true. Now, dont get me wrong, I enjoy numbers (a lot actually), but I feel that businesses nowadays are hanging thei hat on a percentage. Some examples of things I've heard - "Our brand tracking is showing that our awareness has declines 2%... are our TV not working?"  "The advertising strategy is not really moving product (sales)... I really haven't seen a percentage increase..." And I could honestly keep giving examples, but the above two are some I can recall pretty fast. Now, let me say that there is nothing wrong with the above statements, what bothers me is that with numbers we tend to look for one answer and one answer only. The thinking behind this is that there has to be some variable that is affecting the phenomena.But, if the...

Is this not a bit too intrusive?!

I know that good marketing is supposed to catch you a bit off guard and make you think about the message but this is just too much... Why? Because, 1) although it in fact was unexpected, it crossed the privacy line (which by today's standards is pretty low). 2) it's not creative, and 3) lacks authenticity... Which is the last thing you want if you deal with money. Thought?!

Honestly... Who is thinking Arby's??

Having worked at a McDonald's and for the McDonald's brand for a couple of years, seeing advertising like the one below reminds why the golden arches still have the higher share in the fast food market. Please know that I am not saying that McD's has this share solely because of its advertising, but at the very least, their advertising doesn't turn anyone away. While watching TV a couple of weeks ago, I came across the Arby's B-day spot, which you can see below. After watching it I just thought... wow, somebody actually produced this spot? Let me say that there is really nothing wrong with the production, it is more the idea that got produced. The strategy behind this campaign was pretty insightful and good. I'm Thinking Arby's . Ownable , different and niche enough that when you want to eat something hot and tasty only Arby's will suffice, hence you crave and can only think Arby's ... the problem was the execution. Does the guy like the food?...